“Human Dimensions of Oceans: From a Sociological Perspective” blog series is live on FATHOM.

CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE BLOG BY OCEAN NEXUS

As expansionary growth becomes less and less feasible across finite and stressed ocean ecologies, we will likely see more and more rhetoric aimed at conceptualizing marine spaces as “new frontiers” for forms of development that appear exceptionally modern and less materially intensive. These include sectors often imagined as “non-real” or “non-material,” which typically involve financial schemes and real estate speculation. These approaches will offer ‘win-win’ framing, where economic accumulation can occur without harming—even benefiting—complex ecosystems. 
If science speaks for itself, then powerful forces will invariably try to justify inequality and injustice on scientific grounds. Rather, it is important to understand that science is done by people living in societies. As environmental sociologists have long argued, we must therefore understand society if we are to understand science.
While technological innovation is paramount, environmental sociological scholarship on marine food systems and development usually stresses that hunger and unsustainable environmental impacts are political problems exacerbated by rigid and complex social structures. The capacity of aquaculture to ameliorate problems therefore requires careful consideration. What lessons does environmental sociology offer to understand aquaculture’s potential to address these issues, in sustainable fashion? 
Introducing the first installment of "Human Dimensions of Oceans: From a Sociological Perspective." While each blog post in this series will have a different emphasis, a running thread will be the idea that advancing equitable outcomes means, in part, learning how to balance a deep respect for scientific knowledge with an understanding that natural science is a fallible enterprise generated through historically specific conditions of production.